Satirical Essay

11/19/12 English III Homelessness has been an cut down of more(prenominal) dispute through push through time, regardless of whether it is in presend day Portland, Maine or in the antique city of Rome, Italy. People take over been trying to aid the wanderers for a very long time, but clearly, lead never found a solid resolving to the problem. People are sick and tired of go out of their door in the morning and finding a vagrant, still reeking of alcohol which they purchased with a good Samaritans donation, on their stoop.The people fortunate enough to have a home and a good job should not have to suffer when they walk down the street past hobos implore for a few dollars. It is not fair that the wealthy have to interact with the dregs of connection on a daily basis. This problem has to be dealt with. That is why I propose that our society is in much need of the program, Clean Up The Streets (CUTS). The program resolves many different aspects of the issue . If the homeless ar e sent to landfills to collect cardboard and other material in which they give the gate build their own houses with, this gets them out of chaw of the wealthy.In addition to removing the homeless from our lives, it also aids the environment. With this new program, hobos are given a job in which they remove materials from landfills which they can then use to build shelters with. Yearly, the Statesns feature away 30. 9 tons of good food this will make wasteful people feel as if they are actually serving people when they throw away unappreciated food. This also means that there will be grass of food for the newly housed and lend oneselfed people. Also, about $1 billion dollars worth of medicine is thrown out each year, so illness will be quelled as well.The new CUTS program is perfect it resolves the issues of Grinnell 2 vagabond grow, employment, and environmental problems. In todays society, the homeless only get in our way. This is why it is imperative that the CUTS program b e accepted. The first step in cleaning up our streets is housing the homeless. We can do this without donating half of our yearly salary to some hopeless program that supposedly builds fancy houses for the lesser people. With the CUTS program, all homeless are sent to landfills where they alleviate our waste. This is very beneficiary to both arties of society. The primary destruction of the CUTS program is to house every single homeless person in America, and we can do this without burdensome the rich to give to the poor. They (societys privileged few) can now feel good about themselves when they throw away their trash, knowing its going to a good place. In our current economic state, it is more important than ever to improve employment rates. The homeless are to blame for a good pct of the unemployment rate. If the CUTS program was to be accepted, the unemployment rate would drop, drastically.A secondary goal of CUTS, which goes hand in hand with the other objectives, is to emp loy the homeless at landfills across America. Their work would entail searching for waste products. They would only have to salvage 100 lbs of trash a week in order to stay employed and housed. Due to the age of technology, we are learning more and more about our planet. For example, we have learned about how bad Americas gluttony is. With only 6% of the worlds population, Americans generate 35% of the trash and consume 35% of the worlds resources.With the accession of the CUTS program, who knows what those statistics will look like in just ten years. The programs participants will be working, getting free Grinnell 3 food, and also helping save the world in the process. With hundreds of people in their own little community landfills sifting through trash and filth, unimaginable amounts of waste could be reused in the future. The CUTS program could resolve three very current issues if it were to be accepted homelessness, employment, and environmental problems. Although the flawless solution could be considered inhumane, this couldnt be further from the truth.The humanity comes in because the homeless are not agree to the citizens residing in the upper class, mostly because they do not pay tax incomees or work. Why should good tax paying people (who work hard for what they have) be forced to give money to people who have nothing and dont work? Why should those who work hard have to suffer because of the slackers of society? They shouldnt. They are much better suited working hard, just like the upper class does, and bring to society, instead of bumming on the streets. Remember, one mans trash is another mans treasure.